From 2f80b5288126c3b8af61a7a9158019d84b4e6951 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gerrit User 1000028 <1000028@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 12:07:46 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update patch set 10

Patch Set 10:

(2 comments)

Patch-set: 10
CC: Gerrit User 1000028 <1000028@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326>
---
 9bc795e7a1b62d842ae9c4e1844882eb0f4b10d7 | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 9bc795e7a1b62d842ae9c4e1844882eb0f4b10d7

diff --git a/9bc795e7a1b62d842ae9c4e1844882eb0f4b10d7 b/9bc795e7a1b62d842ae9c4e1844882eb0f4b10d7
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6ea33e7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/9bc795e7a1b62d842ae9c4e1844882eb0f4b10d7
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+{
+  "comments": [
+    {
+      "unresolved": false,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "f8a52d97_7aafb27a",
+        "filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
+        "patchSetId": 10
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 0,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 1000028
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2026-03-06T12:07:46Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "As far as I understand, this patch only extends the patch from before so that we can read back multiple values. (I also see that this patch fixes some unrelated things from the patch before) Maybe it makes sense to squash both patches into one?",
+      "revId": "9bc795e7a1b62d842ae9c4e1844882eb0f4b10d7",
+      "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
+    },
+    {
+      "unresolved": true,
+      "key": {
+        "uuid": "2be3fe1e_9d30e01f",
+        "filename": "pySim/esim/saip/personalization.py",
+        "patchSetId": 10
+      },
+      "lineNbr": 209,
+      "author": {
+        "id": 1000028
+      },
+      "writtenOn": "2026-03-06T12:07:46Z",
+      "side": 1,
+      "message": "Ah, ok here you fix the comment chars. Should be ok then.",
+      "revId": "9bc795e7a1b62d842ae9c4e1844882eb0f4b10d7",
+      "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
+    }
+  ]
+}
\ No newline at end of file