forked from public/pysim
Compare commits
9 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8f7d2da554 | |||
| 35483161e8 | |||
| c32d376c98 | |||
| 5657d4653a | |||
| 76c253028e | |||
| b344ee86cc | |||
| 860bef8089 | |||
| b4467ddcfa | |||
| 2ec22b9241 |
@@ -17,6 +17,24 @@
|
||||
"revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "4cf5210a_e1df87dc",
|
||||
"filename": "docs/put_key-tutorial.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 80,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1000028
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2026-03-19T16:33:15Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "I have now reworked this. When I get https://euicc-manual.osmocom.org/docs/lpa/applet-id/ correctly then the purpose of the ISD-P is to be some kind of secure container of the profile. When it also is the \"on-card representative of the SM-DP+\", then the eSIM profile owner (MNO) probably has no influence here at all. This also may explain why it has no keys provisioned. As far as I understand now the ISD-P is not interesting at all in the scope of this tutorial. What we are interested in is the securityDomain that is specified in the eSIM profile.",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "f00a2814_36ab91c0",
|
||||
"revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
@@ -34,6 +52,24 @@
|
||||
"revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "b26a03d3_2f32e64e",
|
||||
"filename": "docs/put_key-tutorial.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 405,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1000028
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2026-03-19T16:50:40Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "I finally found a reference for the KVN range used with SCP81 and it even aligns with my practical observations.",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "d02dc6e7_d739cea5",
|
||||
"revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
@@ -51,6 +87,24 @@
|
||||
"revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "3eab4fe4_cf6a6d15",
|
||||
"filename": "docs/put_key-tutorial.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 462,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1000028
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2026-03-19T16:33:15Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "I have checked this back. Remote Application Management over HTTP – Public Release v1.1.2, section 3.3.2 clearly says that the second key is a DEK key. So this is correct.",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "e399c246_e2140b13",
|
||||
"revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": true,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
@@ -67,6 +121,24 @@
|
||||
"message": "I also tried to provision the key within the permitted range from the table above but it didn\u0027t work.",
|
||||
"revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "0fd3061e_302f0487",
|
||||
"filename": "docs/put_key-tutorial.rst",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 2
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 808,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1000028
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2026-03-19T16:50:40Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "Done",
|
||||
"parentUuid": "ebb60afd_8df5f58f",
|
||||
"revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"comments": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "ce3aeaf3_76986e40",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1000028
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2026-03-19T16:50:40Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "I have reworked the part about the ISD-P. I think this should be good now. The only open question that still remains is the KVN range commonly used for SCP81.",
|
||||
"revId": "1f56ea9be03252123d9fb2e18ed96dedd399ad25",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"comments": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"unresolved": false,
|
||||
"key": {
|
||||
"uuid": "c021df19_2f94a405",
|
||||
"filename": "/PATCHSET_LEVEL",
|
||||
"patchSetId": 4
|
||||
},
|
||||
"lineNbr": 0,
|
||||
"author": {
|
||||
"id": 1000028
|
||||
},
|
||||
"writtenOn": "2026-03-19T16:52:25Z",
|
||||
"side": 1,
|
||||
"message": "I managed to find a source for the KVN range used with SCP80. So all open questions have found an answer now.",
|
||||
"revId": "d82f047f91134f5f74d9d38cffc250d25d7bcd7d",
|
||||
"serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user