v3.25.0: the access-rules check in profiles

A profile file rule may carry accessRules {expected, enabled?, ignoreFciRef?}:
the check resolves the file FCI's '8B' security-attribute reference against
the card's (or the snapshot's) EF.ARR copies and compares the decoded rules as
a set - record-number independent, so cards with a different EF.ARR layout
still verify.  Missing/extra lines are listed in the report; a file whose FCI
lost the reference fails; a reference that cannot be resolved (no cached
EF.ARR / record out of range) is an unverifiable error.

Capture fills the lines when a profile is created from a card
(pysimArrEnsure) or a snapshot (profilerSnapshotArr), before the contents
ignore list - the rules are the meaningful per-file check, and EF.ARR's own
contents stay ignored by default as before.  The editor shows the captured
lines read-only with a None/Check toggle; with exact FCI an optional "Ignore
the EF.ARR reference in the exact FCI" checkbox compares the FCI without the
'8B' value (every other DO stays byte-exact; fcpWithoutArrRef), so a different
record number no longer fails while the rules check owns its meaning.

The snapshot comparison is unchanged (byte-exact EF.ARR + FCI catch record
renumbering).  New 'Access rules' aspect in the report/summary with a
matching/missing/extra line diff.

Tests: capture, the four check outcomes, the ignore-FCI path, the
aspect/report, validation.  877 frontend + 857 Python; sw cache simple-v424.
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-10 23:09:47 +03:00
parent 4d87094a98
commit 3bf005619e
7 changed files with 331 additions and 23 deletions
+2 -1
View File
@@ -465,10 +465,11 @@
<ul class="list-disc list-inside text-sm space-y-1 mb-3">
<li><strong>Path</strong> — starts with <code class="font-mono text-sm">MF</code> (e.g. <code class="font-mono text-sm">MF/7F10/6F3A</code>) or an ADF AID (e.g. <code class="font-mono text-sm">A0000000871002/6F07</code>).</li>
<li><strong>FCP/FCI check</strong> — how much of the file control information to verify: <strong>Filetype only (FCP)</strong> (existence + file type), <strong>Filetype + size (FCP)</strong> (adds file size, or record length/count for record files), or <strong>Exact FCI</strong> (adds a byte-for-byte comparison of the raw SELECT response — the FCP template <code class="font-mono text-sm">'62'</code> — catching FID/AID, life-cycle status, security-attribute and proprietary-parameter changes).</li>
<li><strong>Access rules</strong> &mdash; verifies a file&rsquo;s access conditions as <em>decoded rules</em>, independent of which <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.ARR</code> record the FCI&rsquo;s security-attribute reference (<code class="font-mono text-sm">'8B'</code>) points at: the referenced record&rsquo;s rules are resolved from the card&rsquo;s (or the snapshot&rsquo;s) <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.ARR</code> and compared as a set with the captured lines. Captured automatically when a profile is created from a card or a snapshot for every file whose FCI carries a reference (EF.ARR&rsquo;s own contents are skipped by default &mdash; the rules are the meaningful check); the editor shows the captured lines read-only with a None/Check toggle. A file whose FCI lost the reference fails; a reference that cannot be resolved (no cached <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.ARR</code>, record out of range) is reported as unverifiable. With <strong>Exact FCI</strong>, the optional <em>Ignore the EF.ARR reference in the exact FCI</em> checkbox compares the FCI without the <code class="font-mono text-sm">'8B'</code> value: a different record number no longer fails while every other DO is still compared byte-for-byte (the reference&rsquo;s meaning is verified by this check).</li>
<li><strong>File attributes</strong> — file type, size, record length and record count, taken from the FCP template (any may be left unset).</li>
<li><strong>Check contents</strong> (optional) — <strong>Exact</strong> hex equality, or <strong>Mask</strong> where <code class="font-mono text-sm">?</code> is a per-nibble wildcard (a mask with no <code class="font-mono text-sm">?</code> is a prefix match, e.g. <code class="font-mono text-sm">0891</code> for the IMSI MCC/MNC). Record files store a per-record list.</li>
</ul>
<p class="text-sm mb-3"><strong>Check card</strong> runs every rule against the equipped card and shows a live progress line plus a pass/fail report. Each row states exactly what was verified next to the file path (e.g. <em>filetype and size, contents</em> or <em>exact FCI</em>); when some checks pass and others fail, each aspect is marked (<em>filetype ✓, size ✗, contents ✓</em>) with the mismatches detailed below. Mismatched raw data (FCI, contents, record data) is shown as read-only monospace fields — expected above actual, aligned in the same column — for easy comparison; content mismatches additionally show, for files with a decoder, a decoded per-field comparison (only the differing fields, with expected/actual column headers above the side-by-side values; when the decoded values match, a note says so instead of the table, and a side whose record is all-FF shows <em>Empty (all FF)</em> in its cells), and FCI mismatches additionally show a decoded per-parameter comparison (file size, file descriptor/structure, life cycle, FID, SFI, proprietary parameters…). A decoded FCI preview is also shown beside the FCI hex field while editing a rule. If the FCI data is corrupt, whatever was decoded before the faulty part is shown together with an explicit decode-failure note. For record files with a contents mismatch, a <em>matching records: 1-5, 7-10</em> note lists the records that did match. In the report the mismatch fields and FCI comparison columns are labelled <em>expected (profile name)</em> and <em>actual (card ICCID)</em>, and the results header reads <em>Profile verification results for: &lt;profile&gt; &rarr; &lt;card ICCID&gt;</em>. An <strong>Only mismatches</strong> option in the results header hides all passing files and keeps only failures and errors.</p>
<p class="text-sm mb-3"><strong>Check card</strong> runs every rule against the equipped card and shows a live progress line plus a pass/fail report. Each row states exactly what was verified next to the file path (e.g. <em>filetype and size, contents</em> or <em>exact FCI</em>); when some checks pass and others fail, each aspect is marked (<em>filetype ✓, size ✗, contents ✓</em>) with the mismatches detailed below. Mismatched raw data (FCI, contents, record data) is shown as read-only monospace fields — expected above actual, aligned in the same column — for easy comparison; content mismatches additionally show, for files with a decoder, a decoded per-field comparison (only the differing fields, with expected/actual column headers above the side-by-side values; when the decoded values match, a note says so instead of the table, and a side whose record is all-FF shows <em>Empty (all FF)</em> in its cells), and FCI mismatches additionally show a decoded per-parameter comparison (file size, file descriptor/structure, life cycle, FID, SFI, proprietary parameters…). Access-rule mismatches list the decoded rule lines (&#10003; matching, &minus; missing, + extra). A decoded FCI preview is also shown beside the FCI hex field while editing a rule. If the FCI data is corrupt, whatever was decoded before the faulty part is shown together with an explicit decode-failure note. For record files with a contents mismatch, a <em>matching records: 1-5, 7-10</em> note lists the records that did match. In the report the mismatch fields and FCI comparison columns are labelled <em>expected (profile name)</em> and <em>actual (card ICCID)</em>, and the results header reads <em>Profile verification results for: &lt;profile&gt; &rarr; &lt;card ICCID&gt;</em>. An <strong>Only mismatches</strong> option in the results header hides all passing files and keeps only failures and errors.</p>
<h4 class="font-medium mb-1">&ldquo;Profile from card&rdquo; scan options</h4>
<p class="text-sm mb-2">The scan dialog asks for a profile name and offers a <strong>&ldquo;FCP/FCI check&rdquo;</strong> selector (the same three modes above, default <strong>Filetype + size</strong>) applied to every generated rule, plus an <strong>&ldquo;Ignore contents of files&rdquo;</strong> checklist (all checked by default except <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.ARR</code>; the header checkbox checks or unchecks the whole list) of frequently-overwritten files whose contents are skipped: <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.LOCI</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.PSLOCI</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.EPSLOCI</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.5GS3GPPLOCI</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.Keys</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.KeysPS</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.SMS</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.Kc</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.KcGPRS</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.LOCIGPRS</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.CBMID</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.SMSS</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.ACC</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.EPSNSC</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.START-HFN</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.ARR</code>. Two further checked-by-default options <strong>&ldquo;Match first 4 bytes for&rdquo;</strong> <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.IMSI</code> and <code class="font-mono text-sm">EF.ICCID</code> capture those files&rsquo; contents as a mask of only the first 4 bytes (uncheck for exact matching). A progress line shows <em>N / total files</em> with the current file path while scanning; during the scan the options are hidden and the buttons are locked. Rules are created only for files that actually exist on the card (a FCP template is returned); missing files are skipped. Custom files from the <strong>Custom files</strong> sub-tab are included under the same existence check. The same dialog and options are used by <strong>Profile from snapshot</strong>, which walks the selected snapshot&rsquo;s captured files instead of the card; rules for files whose contents were not captured during the scan get no content check (they are reported as unverifiable when the profile is later checked).</p>