catarrh/simple
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 8 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: drop the "Reserved for 3GPP" event-name cross-reference (v3.6.22)

Browse Source 
The event list tables carried labels like
"12  Reserved for 3GPP - Network rejection (TS 31.111 7.5.2)".  The phrase is
an ETSI-to-3GPP document pointer, not a usage restriction, and it is not
what a user needs - the event name is.

- EVENT_NAMES (PWA + server mirror): the 3GPP-assigned codings carry their
  plain TS 31.111 7.5 name ((I-)WLAN access status, Network rejection, CSG
  cell selection, IMS registration, Incoming IMS data, Data connection
  status change, CAG cell selection, Slices status change).
- 0x20-0x22: "Reserved (future usage)" (no attribution).
- 0x0B/0x14: the spec's full "(single access technology)" / "(multiple
  access technologies)" wording instead of the cryptic "(single)/(multiple)".
- tests pin the exact names and that no name contains the cross-reference.

652 frontend / 500 Python green; version 3.6.22; sw simple-v295.
This commit is contained in:
Антон Трошин
2026-09-28 21:54:28 +03:00
parent 5372a770eb
commit 3c104f5685
6 changed files with 68 additions and 59 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
frontend/tests/event_forms.test.js
+9 -5
View File
@@ -66,15 +66,19 @@ test('cmdQualifierShort returns empty for unknown types', () => {
});
test('EVENT_NAMES follows the pinned CAT spec and names the 3GPP events', () => {
assert.strictEqual(EVENT_NAMES[0x0B], 'Access technology change (single)');
assert.strictEqual(EVENT_NAMES[0x14], 'Access technology change (multiple)');
assert.strictEqual(EVENT_NAMES[0x0B], 'Access technology change (single access technology)');
assert.strictEqual(EVENT_NAMES[0x14], 'Access technology change (multiple access technologies)');
assert.strictEqual(EVENT_NAMES[0x19], 'Profile container');
assert.strictEqual(EVENT_NAMES[0x1C], 'Poll interval negotiation');
for (const [v, frag] of [[0x11, '(I-)WLAN access status'], [0x12, 'Network rejection'],
for (const [v, name] of [[0x11, '(I-)WLAN access status'], [0x12, 'Network rejection'],
[0x15, 'CSG cell selection'], [0x17, 'IMS registration'], [0x18, 'Incoming IMS data'],
[0x1D, 'Data connection status change'], [0x1E, 'CAG cell selection'],
[0x1F, 'Slices status change']]) {
assert.ok(EVENT_NAMES[v].includes(frag), '0x' + v.toString(16) + ': ' + EVENT_NAMES[v]);
[0x1F, 'Slices status change'], [0x20, 'Reserved (future usage)']]) {
assert.strictEqual(EVENT_NAMES[v], name, '0x' + v.toString(16));
}
// the "Reserved for 3GPP" spec cross-reference is never user-facing
for (const [v, name] of Object.entries(EVENT_NAMES)) {
assert.ok(!name.includes('Reserved for 3GPP'), v + ': ' + name);
}
});