fix: SCP80 RC/CPL parity, file-life-cycle labels, EF.ARR and PS template decoders (v3.5.1)
Three fixes found while filling the ETSI/3GPP registry gaps against the SIMalliance Stepping Stones R7: - SCP80 builder/verification parity (TS 31.115 Table 1 NOTE / 4.2 / 4.3): the CPL is now transmitted whenever the packet is ciphered or carries RC/CC/DS - it is part of their input - and whenever the packet needs SMS concatenation; a single unprotected SM keeps pySim's CHL-first form. Before, the JS dropped the CPL for every unciphered packet while the server reference re-added it, so "Verify vs pySim" reported a false MISMATCH for every unciphered RC/CC packet (SPI1 01/02/0A/12/1A...). All ten offered SPI1 values now match the server reference byte-for-byte. - RC (SPI1 b2b1 = 01) was offered but not built: the JS now computes CRC-32 (TS 102 225 5.1.3.2, pySim zlib.crc32 parity) over the same CPL frame as the CC; the packet no longer silently omits the 4-byte RC field. - Server: _build_secured_packet/_ota_reference add the CPL to a concatenated unprotected packet too (Table 1 NOTE / 4.3). - fcpLifeCycle: unlisted values with b8 clear are RFU, b8 set is proprietary (Table 11.7b); previously all unmatched values were labelled proprietary. - EF.ARR decoder now decodes the expanded format (AM_DO/SC_DO per ISO 7816-4 5.4.3.2 + TS 102 221 9.2.7): operation bit masks, INCREASE/RESIZE AM_DO 0x84, OR/AND/NOT templates, PIN key references with usage qualifiers. - FCP 'C6' PS template DO decoded (PS_DO bitmap + key references + usage qualifiers, TS 102 221 11.1.1.4.10/9.5.2) with a shared key-reference map. Tests: sp.test.js (CPL/RC vectors + crc32 known answer), ef_decode.test.js (expanded-format ARR vectors), profiler.test.js (LCSI RFU/proprietary, C6), test_ota_helpers.py (RC reference, unprotected single-SM vs concatenated). Help EN/RU and READMEs: CPL size 2 (SMS), RC/CC/DS 4-8, RC bullet, CPL rule. 547 frontend / 397 Python green; version 3.5.1; sw cache simple-v253.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@ Builds SCP80 secured packets per ETSI TS 102 225.
|
||||
| Field | Size | Description |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| CPI | 1 | Command Packet Identifier (`02`) |
|
||||
| CPL | 1 | Command Packet Length |
|
||||
| CPL | 2 (SMS) | Command Packet Length (CHL..end incl. padding) |
|
||||
| CHI | 1 | Command Header Identifier (`01`) |
|
||||
| CHL | 1 | Command Header Length |
|
||||
| SPI | 2 | Security Parameter Indicator |
|
||||
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ Builds SCP80 secured packets per ETSI TS 102 225.
|
||||
| TAR | 3 | Toolkit Application Reference |
|
||||
| CNTR | 5 | Replay counter |
|
||||
| PCNTR | 1 | Padding counter |
|
||||
| RC/CC/DS | 8 | Cryptographic Checksum / MAC |
|
||||
| RC/CC/DS | 4–8 | Redundancy Check (CRC-32) / Cryptographic Checksum (MAC) / Digital Signature |
|
||||
| Secured Data | variable | Padded APDU (encrypted if required) |
|
||||
|
||||
#### SPI1 (Security Level)
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user