catarrh/simple
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix: UICC file-access parameters use tag 81, not 82 (v3.6.14)

Browse Source 
TS 102 226 8.2.1.3.2.2 defines the EA inner tags as 80 (toolkit params),
C3 (toolkit DAP), 81 (UICC Access Application specific parameters) and 82
(UICC *Administrative* Access) - the plain-text spec extract had shifted the
table columns, so the access list was emitted under 82.  With the list under
82 the card rejected the ADF.USIM entry with 6A80 and the applet never got
its uicc.access.FileView rights (live 2026-09-28).

- stkParamsBuild emits the access list under 81 (the structure is unchanged:
  the admin field is coded the same way per 8.2.1.3.2.2.4).
- tests updated (81 04 / 81 0F / 81 17 expectations).

641 frontend / 496 Python green; version 3.6.14; sw simple-v287.
This commit is contained in:
Антон Трошин
2026-09-28 03:07:40 +03:00
parent 138760f75c
commit 7c683fcb0a
5 changed files with 22 additions and 21 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
frontend/tests/stk_params.test.js
+10 -10
View File
@@ -150,24 +150,24 @@ test('the RAM form fields build the live install parameters end to end', () => {
});
test('UICC file-access parameters (82) are appended in EA mode', () => {
// TS 102 226 8.2.1.3.2.2.2: every entry ends with the "Length of Access
// Domain DAP" byte (00 = no DAP):
// TS 102 226 8.2.1.3.2.2/8.2.1.3.2.2.2: the file-access list is the
// tag '81' field ('82' is the *Administrative* Access field); every entry
// ends with the "Length of Access Domain DAP" byte (00 = no DAP):
// [FS AID len 00 = shared FS][AD len 01][ADP 00 = full][DAP len 00]
// [ADF AID len][ADF AID][AD len 01][ADP 00][DAP len 00]
// The SIM path grants the same rights via the CA Access Domain field; the
// ADF entry is an extension of the file-system entry. A missing DAP
// length byte made the card reject the ADF entry with 6A80 (live
// 2026-09-28).
// ADF entry is an extension of the file-system entry. Under '82' the card
// rejected the ADF entry with 6A80 (live 2026-09-28).
const base = vals({ channels: '1', msl: '12', tar: 'AF4D01' });
assert.strictEqual(stkParamsBuild(Object.assign({}, base, { fsAccess: true })),
'EA15800D000000000102011203AF4D0100820400010000');
'EA15800D000000000102011203AF4D0100810400010000');
assert.strictEqual(
stkParamsBuild(Object.assign({}, base, { fsAccess: true, adfAccess: true })),
'EA20800D000000000102011203AF4D0100820F0001000007A0000000871002010000');
'EA20800D000000000102011203AF4D0100810F0001000007A0000000871002010000');
assert.strictEqual(
stkParamsBuild(Object.assign({}, base, { fsAccess: true, adfAccess: true,
adfAid: 'A0000000871002FF33FFFF89010101' })),
'EA28800D000000000102011203AF4D01008217000100000FA0000000871002FF33FFFF89010101010000');
'EA28800D000000000102011203AF4D01008117000100000FA0000000871002FF33FFFF89010101010000');
assert.strictEqual(stkParamsBuild(base), 'EA0F800D000000000102011203AF4D0100');
assert.strictEqual(stkParamsBuild(Object.assign({}, base, { adfAccess: true })),
'EA0F800D000000000102011203AF4D0100');
@@ -182,12 +182,12 @@ test('the RAM form emits full file access when the checkbox is ticked', () => {
fakeForm({ 'rc-toolkit-enable': true, 'rc-tk-mode': 'ea', 'rc-tk-msl': '12',
'rc-tk-tar': 'AF4D01', 'rc-tk-channels': '1', 'rc-tk-fsaccess': true });
assert.strictEqual(buildRcToolkitParams(),
'EA15800D000000000102011203AF4D0100820400010000');
'EA15800D000000000102011203AF4D0100810400010000');
fakeForm({ 'rc-toolkit-enable': true, 'rc-tk-mode': 'ea', 'rc-tk-msl': '12',
'rc-tk-tar': 'AF4D01', 'rc-tk-channels': '1', 'rc-tk-fsaccess': true,
'rc-tk-adfaccess': true });
assert.strictEqual(buildRcToolkitParams(),
'EA20800D000000000102011203AF4D0100820F0001000007A0000000871002010000');
'EA20800D000000000102011203AF4D0100810F0001000007A0000000871002010000');
});
test('updateStkParamsHex refreshes the field and clears the manual flag', () => {