esim: drive the profile switch ourselves; guard the FCP metadata
Disabling a profile failed with 6985 and left the card stuck until an equip. pySim's send_apdu_checksw auto-handler keeps flushing proactive commands after the REFRESH TERMINAL RESPONSE; the card is then mid-switch and answers 6985 to the next FETCH, which propagated as a 500 and skipped the re-initialization. Per SGP.22 v2.6 5.7.16/5.7.17 a 91XX answer is the ISD-R's 'result OK before REFRESH' (step 6) and the switch completes on the TERMINAL RESPONSE or the following RESET (step 8) - lpac treats 91XX the same way and never retries. - esim.py: build_switch_apdu/parse_switch_response/switch_profile split out of set_profile_state; the switch is one raw STORE DATA via scc._tp.send_apdu, a 91XX runs our own FETCH/TR chain (status_poll=False) and is reported as ok, the STORE DATA is never retried and a chain failure still counts the accepted switch. - server.py: /api/esim/profile answers the REFRESH with our chain, then re-initializes the card and re-reads the profile list, returning verified/state_after; _handle_proactive_chain grew status_poll. - /api/status and /api/select: FCP metadata via _fcp_value - an ADF or a failed select (card with the active profile disabled) has no file_descriptor and used to crash the request handler; _get_file_type no longer raises either. - esim._restore logs a failed selection restore instead of swallowing it. - PWA: esimSwitchStatus shows the verified state / not-confirmed warning. - tests: the switch flow (9000 / 91XX / error SW / chain failure), the FCP guards and the status helper; docs and sw simple-v230.
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
const CACHE = 'simple-v229';
|
||||
const CACHE = 'simple-v230';
|
||||
const URLS = [
|
||||
'index.html',
|
||||
'help.html',
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user