v3.25.0 review: the DF-tree ARR resolution walk-up
The live card references 6F06 from MF-tree files (MF/7F20/6F07 -> 8B 03 6F06 14), but the resolver compared only the path's first segment: the reference fell back to the ADF.USIM copy instead of the file's own DF copy (ISO 7816-4 5.4.3.3 / TS 102 221 9.2.7 walk-up) - masked on this card only because all four copies are byte-identical. - The server reads the DF.TELECOM and DF.GSM copies too (MF/7F10/6F06, MF/7F20/6F06 - TS 51.011), best effort. - fcpArrRules resolves by the file's DF chain (own DF first, then walking up to MF); a reference with no copy in the chain resolves only when a single candidate exists, otherwise it stays silent. - The implicit form prefers the file's DF copy (6F06), walking up to the MF copy (2F06). Tests: the DF copy wins over the ADF copy; two candidates outside the chain stay unresolved; a single one resolves; the implicit walk-up; the server reads the DF-tree paths. 879 frontend + 858 Python; sw cache simple-v424.
This commit is contained in:
+2
-2
@@ -1403,8 +1403,8 @@ is not initialized.
|
||||
|
||||
Returns the card's cached **EF.ARR copies** — the access-rule files the FCP
|
||||
security attribute DO `'8B'` references (ISO 7816-4 Table 25). The copies
|
||||
are read once per card session when a card is equipped (`MF/2F06` and
|
||||
`ADF.USIM/6F06`, best effort) and served from memory, so this endpoint
|
||||
are read once per card session when a card is equipped (`MF/2F06`,
|
||||
`MF/7F10/6F06`, `MF/7F20/6F06` and `ADF.USIM/6F06`, best effort) and served from memory, so this endpoint
|
||||
performs no card I/O; a disconnect clears the cache, and an `EF.ARR` write
|
||||
through `/api/write` refreshes it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user