docs: sync the help and READMEs with the recent UI

Audit of the UI additions against the documentation; fixed gaps:

- help §1.1: the browser Back/Forward view history (v3.22.5) was
  undocumented.
- help §8.9: the TERMINAL RESPONSE result select's spec-table grouping
  (v3.23.8) - the guide had it, the help did not.
- help §7: the snapshot comparison is byte-exact for the FCI and the
  EF.ARR contents and does not run the semantic access-rules aspect
  (that belongs to profiles) - now stated.
- help §3.2 + both READMEs: the two loaded-package RAM operations
  (INSTALL [for install] (loaded package), INSTALL [for make
  selectable]) were missing; the READMEs also lacked the CAP
  compatibility test and still said "two operations" (now five).
- READMEs: the file manager's referenced EF.ARR rules (v3.24.0) and the
  profile access-rules check/editor (v3.25.0) added.
- READMEs: the Cards table gained the PIN/PUK fields (v3.11.0) and the
  CAT release (v3.12.0).

883 frontend + 858 Python; sw cache simple-v424.
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-11 00:27:26 +03:00
parent db78696865
commit ad2ac1cfd7
4 changed files with 27 additions and 12 deletions
+5 -2
View File
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
<li>Language and theme choices are stored in <code class="font-mono text-sm">localStorage</code> and persist across reloads.</li>
<li>Top-level tabs: <strong>Remote APDU</strong> (<strong>SIM RFM</strong>, <strong>USIM RFM</strong>, <strong>RAM/GP</strong>, <strong>Expanded Script</strong>, <strong>Push commands</strong>, <strong>Parser</strong> (<strong>C-APDU Parser</strong>, <strong>R-APDU parser</strong>)), <strong>SCP80</strong> (<strong>Secured Packet</strong>, <strong>RAM</strong>, <strong>TAR probe</strong>), <strong>SCP81</strong> (<strong>Listener</strong>, <strong>Scripts</strong>), <strong>Cards</strong>, <strong>Profiler</strong> (list tabs <strong>Profiles</strong>, <strong>Card snapshots</strong>, <strong>Custom files</strong>), <strong>Card reader</strong> (<strong>File manager</strong>, <strong>pySim command line</strong>, <strong>Raw APDU</strong>), and <strong>Simulator</strong>.</li>
<li>The <strong>help</strong> link opens this documentation at the section matching the current view (e.g. the Profiler tab opens &sect;7).</li>
<li>The browser <strong>Back</strong> / <strong>Forward</strong> buttons walk the app&rsquo;s own view stack &mdash; every tab, pill and list/editor switch is recorded (session-only, the URL never changes); the in-app <em>Cancel</em>/<em>Back</em> buttons replace the current entry instead of stacking a new one.</li>
</ul>
@@ -322,6 +323,8 @@
<tr class="border-b border-gray-200 dark:border-slate-700"><td class="py-1 px-2">Explore Card (all GP data)</td><td class="py-1 px-2">Queries GET STATUS for ISD, Applications, ELFs, and ELF Modules, plus GET DATA FF21 (Extended Card Resources: the number of installed applications and the free non-volatile/volatile memory). The compact listing carries the AID, life cycle and privileges (the legacy format has no version); if a card rejects it (<code class="font-mono text-sm">P2.b2=0</code>, deprecated by GP) the queries are retried in the expanded <code class="font-mono text-sm">E3</code> form, and the <strong>Fetch expanded registry details (load-file / SD associations)</strong> checkbox also requests it as an extra pass and merges the expanded-only fields: the Executable Load File version, Load File AID, Security Domain AID, module lists, the applet STK menu entries (SCP Registry Data, TS 102 226 8.2.1.6) and any other registry data objects the card returns (shown raw, never dropped) &mdash; it costs a few extra secured packets per Explore and is <strong>on by default</strong> (remembered per browser; untick to skip). Cards differ in what they accept, so the expanded query is tried in three forms &mdash; the reference tag list (with the TS 102 226 <code class="font-mono text-sm">EA</code>), the same list without <code class="font-mono text-sm">EA</code>, and no tag list at all (the GlobalPlatformPro form) &mdash; and the explorer reports which form worked and where the run fell back to the compact listing (package versions are then unavailable). When the ELF rows still carry no version, the tag-list forms are retried for both P1=10 and P1=20, skipping the combinations already refused, and the walk stops as soon as a version appears. Results appear in an explorer view (the success line stays minimal; the counts are in the section headings) with per-item <strong>Delete</strong> buttons and the detected RAM command format (hover for what compact vs expanded means).</td></tr>
<tr><td class="py-1 px-2">Install Package (.cap file)</td><td class="py-1 px-2">Sends a <code class="font-mono text-sm">.cap</code> file to the card via the server: INSTALL[for load] &rarr; LOAD &times;N &rarr; INSTALL[for install (+make selectable)]. The load file is split into LOAD APDUs of the <strong>LOAD block size</strong> (1&ndash;240 bytes of payload, 240 by default); each secured packet is delivered as a single SMS or, when larger, as a concatenated SMS-PP download of up to 5 segments, so a large <code class="font-mono text-sm">.cap</code> simply takes several SMS. As soon as the file is selected it is validated and its <strong>memory requirements are estimated</strong> in the form: the <strong>NVRAM requirement</strong> (the code image + persistent data, the GlobalPlatform Card Spec C6+C8 style total) and the RAM estimate. The same box reports the <strong>libraries the CAP is linked against</strong> (its Import component: library name, AID and the minimum version <code class="font-mono text-sm">≥ x.y</code>, with standard names and families resolved and a Java Card SDK hint where known), the package/applet identity and the component breakdown (sizes and shares in load-file order) &mdash; grouped under the <strong>Package</strong>, <strong>Requires</strong>, <strong>Memory</strong> and <strong>Components</strong> headings. The <strong>Platform</strong> line names the minimum Java Card level the card must provide (derived from the <code class="font-mono text-sm">javacard.framework</code> import; the header <code class="font-mono text-sm">int</code> flag additionally requires int support, Java Card 2.2+) and the <strong>ETSI release</strong> the UICC API imports come from (<code class="font-mono text-sm">uicc.toolkit</code> version &rarr; REL-N, per the workspace <code class="font-mono text-sm">sim-tools</code> corpus; shown with its basis in brackets): the JCRE checks every import against its own packages when it verifies the load file (JC VM spec 4.5.2), so a card whose platform is older rejects the LOAD as soon as the <strong>Import</strong> component is complete (the step line carries the card's remote SW and names the component the block completed, e.g. <em>completes Import</em>): the failure hint and the popup then point at the <strong>CAP compatibility test</strong> (one click &mdash; the same <code class="font-mono text-sm">.cap</code> is still selected) to find the missing package and version; a smaller LOAD block only helps when the block exceeds the card's buffer. A corrupt or wrong-format file fails the analysis, and <strong>Execute</strong> stays disabled until a successful analysis. The estimate is informational only and is never used for installation: NVRAM is the code image plus the persistent data (the GlobalPlatform C6+C8 style total, Table 11-48 &mdash; card memory management, rounding and the registry entry are not included, and the static field image is counted in both parts); the suggested <strong>C6</strong> follows the load file, and the suggested quotas are decimal byte counts (the hex in parentheses is how the C7/C8 install parameters encode them: C6 = non-volatile code, C7 = volatile RAM, C8 = non-volatile data).</td></tr>
<tr class="border-b border-gray-200 dark:border-slate-700"><td class="py-1 px-2">CAP compatibility test</td><td class="py-1 px-2">Answers one question without installing anything: <strong>can this card satisfy the CAP's import list?</strong> The server runs the format check, INSTALL[for load] and the LOAD blocks only up to the block that completes the <strong>Import</strong> component &mdash; the point where the JCRE verifies the import list &mdash; then stops: no last-block flag and no INSTALL[for install], so nothing is committed and nothing has to be deleted afterwards. The <strong>Import versions to test</strong> list is pre-filled from the CAP analysis: <code class="font-mono text-sm">AID=version</code> rewrites an import's requested version, <code class="font-mono text-sm">+AID=version</code> appends a synthetic import (a card-capability query: the LOAD passes only if the card exports that package at &ge; that version), and <strong>Set all 0.0</strong> drops every requirement. Two-step use: press Set all 0.0 &mdash; if the test passes, the import list was the blocker; then restore one line at a time to find the package and version the card lacks. The verdict states it covers the <strong>LOAD/import gate only</strong>: the link gate (whether the applet's actual API calls exist) is what a real install checks at INSTALL[for install]. The run and its result appear in a popup (like the install): the step lines, the verdict and a per-AID detail block &mdash; on a rejection it names the CAP section the failing block covers (load-file byte range and components, and whether that block completes <strong>Import</strong>), the remote status word with its meaning, the import list exactly as tested (CAP versions, probe rewrites, appended synthetic entries, unmatched lines) and what the probe state implies; on success it lists the import list that passed.</td></tr>
<tr class="border-b border-gray-200 dark:border-slate-700"><td class="py-1 px-2">INSTALL [for install] (loaded package)</td><td class="py-1 px-2">One INSTALL [for install] APDU for a package that is already loaded on the card (its Load File AID and Module AID, privileges, install/STK parameters and an optional <em>make selectable</em>) &mdash; iterate the install parameters without deleting and re-loading the <code class="font-mono text-sm">.cap</code> every time.</td></tr>
<tr><td class="py-1 px-2">INSTALL [for make selectable]</td><td class="py-1 px-2">One INSTALL [for make selectable] APDU (the instance AID) for an INSTALLED, non-selectable applet instance.</td></tr>
</tbody>
</table>
@@ -480,7 +483,7 @@
<li><strong>Import snapshot</strong> &mdash; loads a snapshot from a JSON file.</li>
<li>Each snapshot row has <strong>Open</strong>, <strong>Export</strong>, and <strong>Delete</strong>. <strong>Open</strong> shows all captured data read-only (raw FCI with the decoded FCI, contents); only the snapshot name is editable.</li>
<li><strong>Check card snapshot</strong> on a profile row runs the profile rules against a snapshot you pick from the list, without a card reader. The report is the same as a live check: the actual side is labelled with the snapshot name (<em>actual (snapshot name)</em>) and the header reads <em>Profile verification results for: &lt;profile&gt; &rarr; &lt;snapshot name&gt;</em>; files whose contents were not captured during the scan are reported as unverifiable errors.</li>
<li><strong>Compare snapshots</strong> compares two snapshots offline, exactly like a profile check but <strong>always exact</strong> (no content masking): pick the <em>master</em> snapshot and the <em>snapshot to check</em> and get the same pass/fail report; in that report the header reads <em>Snapshot comparison results: &lt;master&gt; &rarr; &lt;checked&gt;</em> and the mismatch fields and the FCI comparison columns are labeled with the master and checked snapshot names instead of expected/actual. Files present only in the checked snapshot are reported as extra files. Back to list returns to the Card snapshots tab.</li>
<li><strong>Compare snapshots</strong> compares two snapshots offline, like a profile check but <strong>always exact</strong> (no content masking) and <strong>byte-exact for the FCI and the EF.ARR contents</strong> &mdash; the semantic access-rules aspect belongs to profiles (the comparison&rsquo;s exact FCI catches ARR record renumbering): pick the <em>master</em> snapshot and the <em>snapshot to check</em> and get the same pass/fail report; in that report the header reads <em>Snapshot comparison results: &lt;master&gt; &rarr; &lt;checked&gt;</em> and the mismatch fields and the FCI comparison columns are labeled with the master and checked snapshot names instead of expected/actual. Files present only in the checked snapshot are reported as extra files. Back to list returns to the Card snapshots tab.</li>
</ul>
</section>
@@ -565,7 +568,7 @@
<p class="text-sm mb-2">The pill has <strong>four views</strong>: the <strong>suite list</strong> (default; <em>Add suite</em> / <em>Edit</em> / <em>Run</em> / <em>Export</em> / <em>Delete</em>), the <strong>suite editor</strong> (the suite's scripts in run order &mdash; the optional <em>setup</em> first and the <em>teardown</em> last, marked with role badges; per script <em>Run</em>/<em>Edit</em>/<em>Move</em>/<em>Copy</em>/<em>Delete</em>, the per-member <em>on failure</em> policy <em>stop</em> (default) / <em>continue</em>, and <em>ADM required</em>), the <strong>script editor</strong> (the step list; its <em>Start</em> runs that single script and shows the result under the steps &mdash; not preserved) and the <strong>suite report</strong> (after a suite run: every script's status, its step table with expected/actual, the failing note and a run-log excerpt; the summary with passed/warnings/failed/skipped, wall time, the SCP80 counters before&nbsp;&rarr;&nbsp;after per keyset, the preset and a card-session-changed warning; export as <em>JSON</em> or <em>Markdown</em>). A <strong>suite run</strong> executes its scripts in order in <strong>one card session, without resets and without resume</strong>; <em>on failure</em> decides whether the suite stops at that script or runs the next one, the <strong>teardown always runs</strong> on a stop or a failure (while the card is in the reader) so the next test starts clean, and a card reset stops the suite and is flagged in the report. <strong>Start with card reset</strong> resets the card and runs the full re-initialization before the suite starts (the scripts then run against a freshly initialized card); the preset must still match the card's ICCID afterwards and a required ADM is verified again for the new card session. The initialization consumes the card's initial proactive commands, so a script cannot catch the first command after the reset (they stay in the proactive log). <strong>ADM required</strong> (on the suite or a script) verifies the matched preset's ADM key <strong>once</strong> before the start &mdash; a failure refuses the run (verify manually with the ADM badge; nothing is retried automatically). Scripts live in the suite's store (<code class="font-mono text-sm">~/.pysim-simple-server/test_suites.json</code>, <code class="font-mono text-sm">--test-suites</code>); every script belongs to exactly one suite, and a script can be moved or copied to another suite (a bundle export carries the suite plus its scripts; the old script-only export imports into an auto-created &ldquo;Imported scripts&rdquo; suite).</p>
<ul class="list-disc list-inside text-sm space-y-1 mb-3">
<li><strong>Actions</strong> &mdash; <em>Envelope</em> (Event Download: raw event type + data, with an optional source override &mdash; 82 terminal / 83 network) or <em>Event</em> (the semantic forms: the <strong>same form the Phone tab's send dialog uses</strong>, for every modelled event &mdash; the four events the server builds (Location status, Access technology change, Network rejection, Data connection status change) travel as fields it validates and builds at run time, every other event carries the form's built event-data hex (shown live under the form, with the one-ENVELOPE check); the device-identities source comes from the event (e.g. MT call &rarr; network) or its source field), <em>Menu Selection</em> (item id 1&ndash;255, or the item's text with an exact/contains match, case-insensitive by default &mdash; the step editor's <em>Match case</em> choice switches to an exact-case match; the text is resolved against the card's menu, which follows the applet's install parameters), <em>UPDATE/READ file</em> (path + mode; reads verify the file data), <em>raw APDU</em> (no auto-handler), <em>SCP80</em> (C-APDU or a pre-built secured packet, optional keyset number (kvn) / TAR / SPI1 / SPI2 overrides and a command format &mdash; compact, or the TS 102 226 &sect;5.2.1 Command Scripting template <em>expanded</em> (AA) / <em>expanded AE&nbsp;80</em> around the C-APDU; the keys and the counter come from the card preset matched by the equipped card's ICCID &mdash; the run names the stored preset, so it always uses its keysets, TARs and counter &mdash; the server persists the consumed counter into it as the run proceeds), <em>STATUS</em> (with <em>attempts</em> &gt; 1 it polls until the card announces a command) and <em>Proactive drain</em> (poll STATUS and consume every announced command &mdash; the TERMINAL RESPONSE result for each, optionally a different result for the first; the attempt/interval bound; an optional <em>require</em> assertion over what was drained. An empty poll passes, the final STATUS must be idle, and a still-pending command is handed to the next step &mdash; use it at the start, in the middle or at the end of a script to make sure the card has stopped sending; it also consumes a command a previous step left pending (a step that answered <code class="font-mono text-sm">91XX</code>). Every action has a response check: expected SW and data (exact, or a mask with <code class="font-mono text-sm">?</code> nibble wildcards &mdash; <code class="font-mono text-sm">91??</code>) plus a PoR check for SCP80 (<em>any / no PoR / por_ok</em>, or a custom assertion of the decoded PoR &mdash; status / SW / data; the SEND SHORT MESSAGE transport works the same).</li>
<li><strong>Expectations</strong> &mdash; the card must have announced a proactive command in the previous step (SW <code class="font-mono text-sm">91XX</code>, TS 102 221 &sect;7.4.2.1 / TS 102 223 &sect;6.3); a <code class="font-mono text-sm">9000</code> means &ldquo;no command&rdquo;: the step fails at its fail level &mdash; Error stops the script, Warning continues (the tolerant &ldquo;consume a command if there is one&rdquo; form) &mdash; and a STATUS action with <em>attempts</em> &gt; 1 polls when the applet delivers on poll. The command type, qualifier and contents are verified: text / item / raw checks, an <em>Alpha</em> check (the command's Alpha identifier, tag <code class="font-mono text-sm">05</code>/<code class="font-mono text-sm">85</code> &mdash; distinct from the <code class="font-mono text-sm">8D</code> text string), an <em>SMS TPDU</em> check (the submit TPDU of a SEND SHORT MESSAGE: destination / PID / DCS / UDL / user data &mdash; for an applet's own SMS), a <em>PoR</em> check (a SEND SHORT MESSAGE carries the PoR when the packet requested PoR-in-submit, SPI2 bit <code class="font-mono text-sm">20</code>: the response status, the R-APDU SW and the response data; make sure an SCP80 step ran first &mdash; the R-APDU SW lives <em>inside</em> the response payload: an applet's own TAR returns application data, so check its data and leave the SW empty; a refused ENVELOPE (<code class="font-mono text-sm">62XX</code>/<code class="font-mono text-sm">63XX</code>) may carry no response packet at all &mdash; leave the PoR check at <em>any</em> or expect <em>no PoR</em> for such a step) and a <em>Files</em> check (the File List of a REFRESH, e.g. qualifier <code class="font-mono text-sm">00</code> = NAA initialization with full file change notification). The scripted <strong>TERMINAL RESPONSE</strong> is part of the instruction: the <strong>result</strong> offers the full TS 102 223 &sect;8.12.0 list (each entry labelled <code class="font-mono text-sm">&lt;hex&gt; - &lt;alias or name&gt;</code>, plus a manual hex entry; the aliases follow the spec &mdash; <code class="font-mono text-sm">ok</code> 00, <code class="font-mono text-sm">modified</code> 07, <code class="font-mono text-sm">cancel</code> 10, <code class="font-mono text-sm">timeout</code> 12, <code class="font-mono text-sm">refused</code> 22, <code class="font-mono text-sm">not_understood</code> 32, &hellip;), the <strong>additional information</strong> byte of the general result (default <code class="font-mono text-sm">00</code>; the &sect;8.12.2 terminal-problem values are suggested), the item identifier, the text (+DCS) and extra TLVs.</li>
<li><strong>Expectations</strong> &mdash; the card must have announced a proactive command in the previous step (SW <code class="font-mono text-sm">91XX</code>, TS 102 221 &sect;7.4.2.1 / TS 102 223 &sect;6.3); a <code class="font-mono text-sm">9000</code> means &ldquo;no command&rdquo;: the step fails at its fail level &mdash; Error stops the script, Warning continues (the tolerant &ldquo;consume a command if there is one&rdquo; form) &mdash; and a STATUS action with <em>attempts</em> &gt; 1 polls when the applet delivers on poll. The command type, qualifier and contents are verified: text / item / raw checks, an <em>Alpha</em> check (the command's Alpha identifier, tag <code class="font-mono text-sm">05</code>/<code class="font-mono text-sm">85</code> &mdash; distinct from the <code class="font-mono text-sm">8D</code> text string), an <em>SMS TPDU</em> check (the submit TPDU of a SEND SHORT MESSAGE: destination / PID / DCS / UDL / user data &mdash; for an applet's own SMS), a <em>PoR</em> check (a SEND SHORT MESSAGE carries the PoR when the packet requested PoR-in-submit, SPI2 bit <code class="font-mono text-sm">20</code>: the response status, the R-APDU SW and the response data; make sure an SCP80 step ran first &mdash; the R-APDU SW lives <em>inside</em> the response payload: an applet's own TAR returns application data, so check its data and leave the SW empty; a refused ENVELOPE (<code class="font-mono text-sm">62XX</code>/<code class="font-mono text-sm">63XX</code>) may carry no response packet at all &mdash; leave the PoR check at <em>any</em> or expect <em>no PoR</em> for such a step) and a <em>Files</em> check (the File List of a REFRESH, e.g. qualifier <code class="font-mono text-sm">00</code> = NAA initialization with full file change notification). The scripted <strong>TERMINAL RESPONSE</strong> is part of the instruction: the <strong>result</strong> offers the full TS 102 223 &sect;8.12.0 list (each entry labelled <code class="font-mono text-sm">&lt;hex&gt; - &lt;alias or name&gt;</code>, plus a manual hex entry; with a command selected the list is grouped by the spec&rsquo;s applicability table (the command-relevant values first, the rest after &mdash; nothing is hidden); the aliases follow the spec &mdash; <code class="font-mono text-sm">ok</code> 00, <code class="font-mono text-sm">modified</code> 07, <code class="font-mono text-sm">cancel</code> 10, <code class="font-mono text-sm">timeout</code> 12, <code class="font-mono text-sm">refused</code> 22, <code class="font-mono text-sm">not_understood</code> 32, &hellip;), the <strong>additional information</strong> byte of the general result (default <code class="font-mono text-sm">00</code>; the &sect;8.12.2 terminal-problem values are suggested), the item identifier, the text (+DCS) and extra TLVs.</li>
<li><strong>Fail levels</strong> &mdash; a mismatch flags the step as <em>Error</em> (terminates the script) or <em>Warning</em> (continues); every step failure honours it, including an expectation that finds no pending command and a card error raised during the step (an absent optional file's <code class="font-mono text-sm">6A82</code>); each check is reported with expected vs actual values.</li>
<li><strong>Templates</strong> &mdash; Empty, <em>STK menu browsing</em>, <em>Applet via SCP80</em>; the step editor is form-based (the event action renders the Simulator's event form), and a suite exports/imports as a JSON bundle (the suite plus its scripts).</li>
</ul>