fix: DELETE APDU is case 3 - no phantom command (v3.6.15)

The Explore delete showed "Failed: por_ok - remote SW 6700" while the delete
executed: ramDeleteApdu appended the trailing Le, and this card's SCP80
layer counts a trailing byte as a phantom second command whose SW 6700
masked the real result (count=2, last SW 6700) - the same quirk as
INSTALL [for load] before v3.6.8.

- ramDeleteApdu and the chain builder's DELETE row emit the case-3 APDU
  (4F AID TLV, no Le); the SCP81 Delete-AID template follows (it reuses
  ramDeleteApdu).
- tests updated (delete APDU expectations in ram/ram_counter_flow/scripts).

641 frontend / 496 Python green; version 3.6.15; sw simple-v288.
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-28 03:16:10 +03:00
parent 7c683fcb0a
commit bab787fac1
7 changed files with 24 additions and 19 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ test('scriptsParseApdus accepts comments and whitespace, rejects bad lines', ()
test('scp81DeleteApdus builds GP DELETE APDUs per AID', () => {
assert.deepStrictEqual(scp81DeleteApdus(['A000000003000000'], '00'),
['80E400000A4F08A00000000300000000']);
['80E400000A4F08A000000003000000']);
assert.deepStrictEqual(scp81DeleteApdus(['A000000003000000', 'A000000100'], '80'),
['80E400800A4F08A00000000300000000', '80E40080074F05A00000010000']);
['80E400800A4F08A000000003000000', '80E40080074F05A000000100']);
assert.deepStrictEqual(scp81DeleteApdus([], '00'), []);
});