The alfa-dsa control-commands run showed the error case: an applet-level
refusal (envelope 6200 for an unknown command) carries no PoR at all, so
a por expectation on such a step can never match. The authoring guide's
status-words section now states that a 62XX/63XX envelope does not
guarantee a response packet - other warning paths still deliver one (the
low-counter case arrives via SEND SHORT MESSAGE) - and that a step
expected to be refused should leave por at its "any" default or assert
"none"; help EN/RU notes the same. docs/test-scripts.md only, no code
change; sw cache simple-v392 (help files are precached).
catarrh
0d63e5592f
