The RAM installer read `por['decoded']['response_status']`, but the compact
response decoder's `decoded` only carries {number_of_commands,
last_status_word, last_response_data} - so the suffix was always empty and
every step showed the useless `por_error_`, even when the PoR was por_ok.
The PoR verdict is the top-level `response_status`.
With that fixed, the decoded details also show that the remote command's own
status word was the real verdict all along: a captured live install returned
por_ok with `last_status_word` 6700/6F00 (the card rejected every RAM APDU)
while the installer reported success.
- new `_ram_step_result()`/`_por_remote_sw()`/`_ram_remote_sw_ok()`: a step
fails on a non-por_ok PoR, on a remote SW outside the success set (9000,
61xx more data, 62xx/63xx warnings, CAFE GP "more data"), or on an
undecodable PoR (a 9000 transport SW with no PoR at all is `no_por`, not a
failure). A decoded 61xx is explicitly success, per GP/ISO.
- step records gain por_sw/por_type/por_cntr/por_data/por_raw and
`por_error`; the response carries `failed_step` and a detailed error such
as `LOAD (1/9): remote SW 6700`; the log line now prints
`status=por_ok remote_sw=6700`.
- PWA: new pure `ramStepLine()` renders e.g.
`❌ Шаг 2: LOAD (1/9) — PoR ok · remote SW 6700 (Wrong length in Lc) · 274 B / 3 SMS`
(SW meaning via the existing lookupSw decoder) and the transport SW only
when it is not 9000.
- tests: tests/test_ota_helpers.py RamPorStepTest (success set incl. 61xx,
the captured 6700 failure, no-PoR/undecodable, expanded responses);
ram.test.js ramStepLine cases.
- docs/api.md RAM install step fields + failure semantics; AGENTS updated.
603 frontend / 487 Python green; version 3.6.2; sw simple-v275.
catarrh
36d2f71bc7