Files
simple/tests
catarrh 86808ce55d esim: drive the profile switch ourselves; guard the FCP metadata
Disabling a profile failed with 6985 and left the card stuck until an
equip.  pySim's send_apdu_checksw auto-handler keeps flushing proactive
commands after the REFRESH TERMINAL RESPONSE; the card is then mid-switch
and answers 6985 to the next FETCH, which propagated as a 500 and skipped
the re-initialization.  Per SGP.22 v2.6 5.7.16/5.7.17 a 91XX answer is
the ISD-R's 'result OK before REFRESH' (step 6) and the switch completes
on the TERMINAL RESPONSE or the following RESET (step 8) - lpac treats
91XX the same way and never retries.

- esim.py: build_switch_apdu/parse_switch_response/switch_profile split
  out of set_profile_state; the switch is one raw STORE DATA via
  scc._tp.send_apdu, a 91XX runs our own FETCH/TR chain (status_poll=False)
  and is reported as ok, the STORE DATA is never retried and a chain
  failure still counts the accepted switch.
- server.py: /api/esim/profile answers the REFRESH with our chain, then
  re-initializes the card and re-reads the profile list, returning
  verified/state_after; _handle_proactive_chain grew status_poll.
- /api/status and /api/select: FCP metadata via _fcp_value - an ADF or a
  failed select (card with the active profile disabled) has no
  file_descriptor and used to crash the request handler; _get_file_type
  no longer raises either.
- esim._restore logs a failed selection restore instead of swallowing it.
- PWA: esimSwitchStatus shows the verified state / not-confirmed warning.
- tests: the switch flow (9000 / 91XX / error SW / chain failure), the
  FCP guards and the status helper; docs and sw simple-v230.
2026-09-22 00:14:02 +03:00
..
2026-09-19 08:25:20 +03:00