From b4467ddcfaa2e78e5704f820cd8bd036edb8c7b4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerrit User 1000028 <1000028@035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 16:33:15 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update patch set 3 Patch Set 3: (2 comments) Patch-set: 3 --- 177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5 | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5 b/177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5 index e6888baa..78b990f5 100644 --- a/177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5 +++ b/177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5 @@ -17,6 +17,24 @@ "revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5", "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326" }, + { + "unresolved": false, + "key": { + "uuid": "4cf5210a_e1df87dc", + "filename": "docs/put_key-tutorial.rst", + "patchSetId": 2 + }, + "lineNbr": 80, + "author": { + "id": 1000028 + }, + "writtenOn": "2026-03-19T16:33:15Z", + "side": 1, + "message": "I have now reworked this. When I get https://euicc-manual.osmocom.org/docs/lpa/applet-id/ correctly then the purpose of the ISD-P is to be some kind of secure container of the profile. When it also is the \"on-card representative of the SM-DP+\", then the eSIM profile owner (MNO) probably has no influence here at all. This also may explain why it has no keys provisioned. As far as I understand now the ISD-P is not interesting at all in the scope of this tutorial. What we are interested in is the securityDomain that is specified in the eSIM profile.", + "parentUuid": "f00a2814_36ab91c0", + "revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5", + "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326" + }, { "unresolved": true, "key": { @@ -51,6 +69,24 @@ "revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5", "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326" }, + { + "unresolved": false, + "key": { + "uuid": "3eab4fe4_cf6a6d15", + "filename": "docs/put_key-tutorial.rst", + "patchSetId": 2 + }, + "lineNbr": 462, + "author": { + "id": 1000028 + }, + "writtenOn": "2026-03-19T16:33:15Z", + "side": 1, + "message": "I have checked this back. Remote Application Management over HTTP – Public Release v1.1.2, section 3.3.2 clearly says that the second key is a DEK key. So this is correct.", + "parentUuid": "e399c246_e2140b13", + "revId": "177a45d2ae3c8df71a744fc145ed442fa53914a5", + "serverId": "035e6965-6537-41bd-912c-053f3cf69326" + }, { "unresolved": true, "key": {