SCP.overhead was so far set at construction time (SCP02: 8, SCP03:
s_mode), so the C-MAC length only.
Unfortunately sec lvl >= 3 pads the data field to the cipher block size
before encryption, so the real worst-case overhead is larger,
scc.max_cmd_len (255 - overhead) was too big, and ADF_SD.load()
used a hardcoded chunk_len=240.
Real world issue with a 286 byte CAP + SCP02 + sec lvl 3:
- 240-byte LOAD block is padded to 248,
- encrypted
- gets 8 byte C-MAC appended
-> Lc = 256
That dies with a weird "ValueError: bytes must be in range(0, 256)".
The only "fix" for that was to downgrade the seclevel.
STORE DATA has the same overflow with large max_cmd_len
(247 + padding + MAC = 256 as well).
Therefore the overhead must be properly calculated from the sec level.
While at it adjust the error in case I missed something to get a more
useful ValueError.
Change-Id: Ic208f3959a38896f64fb6ccefb24cc360a3ac3a2
how encrypt_key() pads a kcv:
len(key) % blocksize bytes
what it should do to actually do it right:
blocksize - len(key) % blocksize
so the plaintext handed to the cipher was only block aligned by luck as
long as the key length happened to be a multiple of half the block size.
And of course decrypt_key() did not invert encrypt_key() at all,
the clear text length of GP CardSpec v2.3 Table 11-70 precedes the
ENCRYPTED kcv, but it was parsed out of the DECRYPTED data, and the
length byte itself was fed to the cipher along with the cryptogram.
Fix this up with a helper and tests so it is actually usable.
Change-Id: I02b4f2ed948c31e1741e40f0226fb49757fa2570
gen_install_parameters() had contradictory logic: the outer guard
required all three arguments to be non-None/non-empty (making them
mutually inclusive), while the inner checks then treated each one
as optional.
Make each parameter independently optional (defaulting to None) and
remove the all-or-nothing check. Simplify the function body to a
straightforward single-pass construction of system_specific_params.
Change-Id: I8756fb38016cdf0527fe2e21edb44381d1dc557f
Installing JAVA-card applets from a CAP file is a multi step process, which is
difficult when done manually. Fortunately it is easy to automate the process,
so let's add a dedicated command for that.
Change-Id: I6cbd37f0fad5579b20e83c27349bd5acc129e6d0
Related: OS#6679
ETSI TS 102 221, section 7.3 specifies that UICCs (and eUICCs) may support two
different transport protocols: T=0 or T=1 or both. The spec also says that the
terminal must support both protocols.
This patch adds the necessary functionality to support the T=1 protocol
alongside the T=0 protocol. However, this also means that we have to sharpen
the lines between APDUs and TPDUs.
As this patch also touches the low level interface to readers it was also
manually tested with a classic serial reader. Calypso and AT command readers
were not tested.
Change-Id: I8b56d7804a2b4c392f43f8540e0b6e70001a8970
Related: OS#6367
We're creating a 'pyosmocom' pypi module which contains a number of core
Osmocom libraries / interfaces that are not specific to SIM card stuff
contained here.
The main modules moved in this initial step are pySim.tlv, pySim.utils
and pySim.construct. utils is split, not all of the contents is
unrelated to SIM Cards. The other two are moved completely.
Change-Id: I4b63e45bcb0c9ba2424dacf85e0222aee735f411
We currently mix the unit-tests with the shell script based integration
tests. Let's put them into a dedicated sub directory.
Related: OS#6531
Change-Id: I0978c5353d0d479a050bbb6e7ae5a63db5e08d24
Eric Wild