profiler: dedupe redundant record-count failure in check report

A record file with both a numRecords metadata check and record content
checks reported the same count mismatch twice (numRecords and
content.records). profilerRunRule now omits the content.records line when
the numRecords check already covers it, keeping it only when no numRecords
check ran (FCP/FCI 'type' mode or numRecords cleared) or when numRecords
passes but the read returns a different count.

3 new tests. SW cache v58 -> v59.

frontend/index.html

@@ -7642,7 +7642,10 @@ async function profilerRunRule(r) {
 			const n = Math.min(exp.length, act.length);
 			if (exp.length !== act.length) {
 				res.status = 'fail';
-				res.checks.push({ label: 'content.records', expected: exp.length + ' records', actual: act.length + ' records', ok: false });
+				const numRec = res.checks.find(c => c.label === 'numRecords');
+				if (!numRec || numRec.ok) {
+					res.checks.push({ label: 'content.records', expected: exp.length + ' records', actual: act.length + ' records', ok: false });
+				}
 			}
 			const matched = [];
 			for (let j = 0; j < n; j++) {

frontend/sw.js

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-const CACHE = 'otaman-v58';
+const CACHE = 'otaman-v59';
 const URLS = [
   'index.html',
   'help.html',

frontend/tests/profiler.test.js

@@ -474,6 +474,46 @@ test('profilerRunRule records which records matched on a record mismatch', async
 	assert.deepStrictEqual(res.recordsMatched, [1, 3]);
 });
 
+const REC_SELECT_10 = { name: 'EF.X', fid: '6F3A', file_type: 'linear_fixed', file_size: null, record_len: 2, num_of_rec: 10, exists: true };
+const REC_EXP_30 = (() => { const r = []; for (let i = 1; i <= 30; i++) r.push({ num: i, data: 'AB' }); return r; })();
+const REC_ACT_10 = (() => { const r = []; for (let i = 1; i <= 10; i++) r.push({ num: i, data: 'AB' }); return r; })();
+
+test('record count mismatch is reported once when numRecords is checked', async () => {
+	mockFetch({ '/api/select': () => REC_SELECT_10, '/api/read': () => ({ success: true, records: REC_ACT_10 }) });
+	const res = await profilerRunRule({
+		path: 'MF/7F20/6F3A', fileType: 'linear_fixed', recordLen: 2, numRecords: 30, fciMode: 'type_size',
+		content: { mode: 'exact', kind: 'record', records: REC_EXP_30 },
+	});
+	assert.strictEqual(res.status, 'fail');
+	assert.ok(res.checks.some(c => c.label === 'numRecords' && c.ok === false));
+	assert.ok(!res.checks.some(c => c.label === 'content.records'));
+});
+
+test('record count mismatch keeps content.records when numRecords is not checked (type mode)', async () => {
+	mockFetch({ '/api/select': () => REC_SELECT_10, '/api/read': () => ({ success: true, records: REC_ACT_10 }) });
+	const res = await profilerRunRule({
+		path: 'MF/7F20/6F3A', fileType: 'linear_fixed', recordLen: 2, numRecords: 30, fciMode: 'type',
+		content: { mode: 'exact', kind: 'record', records: REC_EXP_30 },
+	});
+	assert.strictEqual(res.status, 'fail');
+	assert.ok(res.checks.some(c => c.label === 'content.records' && c.ok === false));
+	assert.ok(!res.checks.some(c => c.label === 'numRecords'));
+});
+
+test('record count mismatch keeps content.records when numRecords passes but read differs', async () => {
+	mockFetch({
+		'/api/select': () => ({ ...REC_SELECT_10, num_of_rec: 3 }),
+		'/api/read': () => ({ success: true, records: REC_ACT_10.slice(0, 2) }),
+	});
+	const res = await profilerRunRule({
+		path: 'MF/7F20/6F3A', fileType: 'linear_fixed', recordLen: 2, numRecords: 3, fciMode: 'type_size',
+		content: { mode: 'exact', kind: 'record', records: [{ num: 1, data: 'AB' }, { num: 2, data: 'AB' }, { num: 3, data: 'AB' }] },
+	});
+	assert.strictEqual(res.status, 'fail');
+	assert.ok(res.checks.some(c => c.label === 'numRecords' && c.ok === true));
+	assert.ok(res.checks.some(c => c.label === 'content.records' && c.ok === false));
+});
+
 test('profilerRenderReport includes the checked-aspects summary and matching-record note', () => {
 	global.t = s => s;
 	global.pysimCustomFiles = [];