The Explore delete showed "Failed: por_ok - remote SW 6700" while the delete
executed: ramDeleteApdu appended the trailing Le, and this card's SCP80
layer counts a trailing byte as a phantom second command whose SW 6700
masked the real result (count=2, last SW 6700) - the same quirk as
INSTALL [for load] before v3.6.8.
- ramDeleteApdu and the chain builder's DELETE row emit the case-3 APDU
(4F AID TLV, no Le); the SCP81 Delete-AID template follows (it reuses
ramDeleteApdu).
- tests updated (delete APDU expectations in ram/ram_counter_flow/scripts).
641 frontend / 496 Python green; version 3.6.15; sw simple-v288.
"Failed: 9000" although the delete executed: the RAM helpers sent
`sp-spi2` - the base SPI2 select, whose default is "00 - No PoR" - so the
card answered the envelope 9000 with no PoR and the verdict treated the
missing PoR as a failure. `cardsApplyFields` also set `sp-spi2-hex` from
the preset and then `updateSp()` recomputed it from the selects (which the
preset never updated), clobbering the preset byte for anything reading it.
- `getRamSpParams()` reads the computed `sp-spi2-hex`; `cardsApplyFields`
syncs the SPI2 selects from the preset byte (base = low 5 bits, bit 0x20
= PoR via SMS-SUBMIT, dynamic option for unlisted bases) and the base
select gains the missing cipher + RC/CC/DS combinations (15/19/1D).
- a missing PoR is no longer a failure (the SPI may request none, and the
card sometimes refuses one): `OK` with the SW, or `OK (no PoR)`.
- a successful delete drops the object from the Explore result locally (no
re-explore): an applet row goes away; a cascade package delete also drops
the applets whose AID starts with the package AID. The consumed counter
is still saved.
- tests: ramRemoveFromExplorer (app/cascade/prefix), the no-PoR flow, the
SPI2 source guard, and the updated delete-flow stubs.
641 frontend / 496 Python green; version 3.6.13; sw simple-v286.
The Apps query (P1=40) was sent with SPI2=0x01 while only the ELF queries
(P1=20/10) used SPI2=0x21. The Apps listing can exceed the ENVELOPE
response, and the card then answers the envelope PoR with
`actual_response_sms_submit` - the actual response would follow as an
SMS-SUBMIT, which is never sent unless the PoR is requested in submit mode.
The paginate only accepted `por_ok`, so the Explore reported the raw status
as an error ("Partial - Apps: actual_response_sms_submit") and the Apps list
never rendered (live 2026-09-28).
- `ramListingSpi2(p1)`: 40/20/10 -> '21', else '01'; the paginate uses it.
- the paginate accepts `actual_response_sms_submit` via `spPorAccepted` and,
when no data arrived, notes "response via SMS not captured" instead of
reporting the card status as a failure.
- the Explore delete verdict follows the same acceptance rule (an accepted
SMS-submit delete no longer shows "Failed" while its counter advanced) and
no longer prints a dangling " -> " without a SW.
- tests: ramListingSpi2 + the delete-accepted-via-sms-submit flow.
633 frontend / 496 Python green; version 3.6.10; sw simple-v283.
The RAM install form sent the `STK parameters (hex)` field, which was only
regenerated when the toolkit checkbox or the mode select changed - editing
the TAR (or any other toolkit field) afterwards was silently dropped. The
live install therefore carried the form defaults (TAR B00001, textLen 0,
menus 0, MSL 16, channels 0) instead of the entered AF4D01 / MSL 12 /
channels 1, and the card rejected the install parameters with 6A80
(TS 102 226 8.2.1.3.2.7: a TAR already assigned on the card).
- every `rc-tk-*` field regenerates the hex on input/change; the install
recomputes it at send time unless the user hand-edited the hex
(`dataset.manual`), so the edit order can no longer drop values;
- one pure `stkParamsBuild` serves the RAM form (`buildRcToolkitParams`) and
the RAM/GP chain rows (`buildTkParams`) - no drift between them (the chain
row also gains the menu-ID <= 7F check);
- applet TAR field: empty by default, no placeholder - B0 00 01 is the
allocated ADF RFM TAR (TS 101 220 Annex D), not an applet TAR; an empty
field is coded as TAR length 00 (the card may take a TAR from the AID only
when the AID carries one, PIX hex digits 15-20);
- the chain builder's INSTALL/LOAD rows drop the trailing Le (the v3.6.8
server form; a trailing Le made the card execute a phantom command);
- tests: stk_params.test.js (the decrypted live parameters, empty-TAR
coding, CA wrapper, long-form lengths, rejection cases, form wiring, and
the form -> hex path with the real builders) and ram_counter_flow.test.js
(the Explore delete persists the consumed counter through the real
ramSaveCntr); STK fixtures no longer use B00001.
631 frontend / 496 Python green; version 3.6.9; sw simple-v282.
catarrh