The three nits from the review of the rename/docs commits:
- the PWA comment above TEST_ACTION_KINDS still claimed the final SCP80
counter is written back - the server persists every consumed counter into
the preset and the snapshot carries the latest values (display only);
- test-scripts.md's `por` paragraph regained the RM raw fallback the rewrite
dropped: a remote-management reply that cannot be the compact structure
(its command count exceeds the command script that was sent, or the data
is too short for TS 102 226 5.1.2 Table 5.1) is raw too;
- the RU help label reads "Очистка очереди проактивных команд" (the mixed
Latin "proactive" is gone; the rest of the RU help says "проактивных
команд"). sw cache simple-v405.
Docs/comment only - tests unchanged and green: 839 frontend + 804 Python.
- the actions table still named the drain kind `proactive` (the rename swept
the prose but missed the table row);
- the `por` check paragraph carried the pre-3.21.0 rule (the command-count
bound): the response form follows the command's TAR and a short reply is
raw too - now cross-referenced to "The three status words";
- the event action's `src`: the editor writes the event's own source
(network for MT call / IMS registration), a hand-written step without
`src` is sent as the terminal;
- the format line notes the kind was `proactive` until 3.22.1;
- the cleanup section notes that each suite member ends the same way, the
"no actions" note names the ok drain, and the polling limitation mentions
proactive-drain.
Docs only.
The kind string `proactive` read like an expectation of a proactive command
(`expect` is the step type for that) although the action consumes and answers
them. Renamed everywhere:
- ACTION_KINDS / TEST_ACTION_KINDS (drift-tested), the normaliser branch and
its error strings, the dispatch and the helper names (_test_run_drain,
_drain_require_match/_label);
- the report label is DRAIN and the PWA summary reads "DRAIN x5 require ...
TR ok";
- the editor/collect/summary/problem branches, docs/test-scripts.md
(Proactive drain), docs/api.md, help EN/RU ("Очистка очереди proactive");
- the tests (TestRunnerProactiveDrain, the normalisation/data-check tests).
No stored scripts used the old kind (unpublished series), so there is no
alias and no migration. sw cache simple-v404.
Tests: 839 frontend + 804 Python green.
Second review round on the unpushed v3.20.0-v3.22.0 batch:
- install parameters: a zero memory quota (nv_quota: 0 - the vendor
reference form's C7 02 0000 C8 02 0000) is composed instead of being
dropped as "unset" (only None/blank leaves the TLV out); a truncated EF
length in stk_params is refused instead of read as an empty EF.
- test suites: a suite whose member script is gone is repairable - the
update endpoint accepts pruning a dangling reference (a removal of a
live script stays refused; the PWA's row Delete prunes it), and
reconcile_scripts_to_suites() lists an orphan even when its suite_id
write is refused by the validator, so a stored script that no longer
validates stays visible in the editor and fails at run start with the
message instead of disappearing.
- engine/PWA: the proactive action refuses a check.data (its result data
is the drained-command list - the check was silently ignored); the
vestigial _testScriptDraft is gone; berLenStr emits the 2/3-byte BER
long form (a >255-byte C9 composes correctly).
- docs: api.md (the stop cleanup answers ok, never an automatic cancel;
the server persists the counters - the PWA does not write them back; the
suite bundle import always merges the scripts; the quota-0 note) and
test-scripts.md (the event action covers all modelled events; the
direct-create path needs a suite_id; the format history); help EN/RU
counter wording.
- tests: the zero quota / truncated EF, the prune path, the invalid-script
listing, the proactive data-check refusal, berLenStr and the >255-byte
C9. Tests: 839 frontend + 804 Python; sw cache simple-v403.
The test-script event action edited its fields as a JSON textarea and only
accepted the four events events.py builds; every other event needed the raw
envelope action with hand-copied hex. It now renders the same EVENT_FORMS
form the Phone tab's send dialog uses, for every modelled event (29; no
release gating - a script may target another card).
- PWA: the field renderer/collector is shared (eventFormFieldsHtml /
eventFormValues / eventFormPatternError / eventFormSrc / eventFieldGroupsUpdate);
the Phone tab keeps its ids, its release gating and its onchange updaters,
the step editor uses test-f-ev- ids, the generic group updater and a live
Event data (hex) preview with the one-ENVELOPE check. The event select
lists all EVENT_FORMS events (the numeric keys are decimal strings -
parseInt(k, 10)); the action stores the collected fields, the built data
and the event's source (fixed cfg.src or the cfg.srcField input - the
action never carried src before, so MT call / IMS registration / slices
could not be network-sourced). The JSON textarea is gone.
- engine: the `event` action keeps `fields` validation for the four
server-built events (a stray data hex is ignored) and accepts the
form-built `data` for every other event - hex-validated and checked
against events.EVENT_DATA_MAX (244, the one-ENVELOPE budget; server.py's
_EVENT_DATA_MAX now reads it from events.py). The runner builds the four
at run time (fresh host clock) and sends the stored data for the rest.
- tests: the engine's data path (accepted / missing / malformed / oversized,
the four still fields-built), the runner sending the data (fake scc), the
editor's collect/prefill/patterns/source (Node), the shared helpers.
Docs: test-scripts.md, api.md, help EN/RU. Tests: 838 frontend +
797 Python; sw cache simple-v401.
A suite is the root object: every script belongs to exactly one suite, the
suite holds the ordered member list by reference - the optional setup first,
the members, the optional teardown last - and runs them in one card session,
without resets and without resume.
- test_suites.py: the suite store (test_suites.json, --test-suites), validated
and atomic like the script store: roles normalised (setup first, teardown
last, at most one of each, a script appears once per suite), per-member
on_fail stop/continue and the suite-level require_adm.
- test_scripts.py schema v2: suite_id/require_adm; list_by_suite()/orphans();
the import reports the id_map a bundle import remaps with. v3.21.0 scripts
without a suite are attached once to an auto-created "Imported scripts"
suite (migrate_scripts_to_suites, called from __main__).
- API: /api/test/suites (+ update|delete|import - delete refused while
non-empty; the bundle import imports the scripts first, remaps the suite
references and skips unresolvable ones); the scripts endpoints gain
suite_id/require_adm plus move|copy (delete detaches from the suite first;
a suite update refuses a membership change).
- runner: /api/test/run {suite_id} resolves the members and the preset, runs
the ADM gate, then setup -> members (per-member on_fail) -> teardown. The
teardown always runs on a stop or a failure (skipped only when the card is
gone; it clears the stop flag for its duration); a card reset stops the
suite, skips the remaining members and is flagged. Members' live steps land
in the shared snapshot, their records (status/steps/note/log excerpt/
counters) in _TEST_RUN['suite']; the summary carries the counts, wall time,
preset, the SCP80 counters before/after per keyset and the session flags.
_test_log buffers the semantic lines (bounded) for the report's per-member
excerpts.
- ADM gate (_ensure_adm): a suite/script require_adm verifies the matched
preset's key once per card session (the /api/verify-adm badge sets the same
latch); a failure refuses the start, stamps the session (no automatic
retry) and needs a manual verify.
- PWA: the Test script pill becomes four views - the suite list (default),
the suite editor (the script list: role badges, on_fail, up/down, per-script
Run/Edit/Move/Copy/Delete, Add script with the templates), the script editor
(the step list; a single run shows its result under the steps and is not
preserved) and the suite report (per-member blocks with the step table,
notes and run log; summary; export JSON/Markdown). Suite bundles export/
import; the legacy script export imports into "Imported scripts". EN/RU.
- tests: the suite store/migration, the runner orchestration (order, on_fail,
setup failure, stop, card reset, teardown, per-member logs) and the ADM gate
(Python); the suite HTTP paths; the PWA report/Markdown/wiring (Node).
Tests: 833 frontend + 794 Python; sw cache simple-v397.
Five reported issues, plus the action that makes an explicit drain possible:
- on_fail is honoured by every step failure: an expectation with no pending
command (or a FETCH that returns nothing) fails as a Command/Fetch check at
the step's level instead of raising past it; the default still stops the
run, on_fail "warning" continues (the tolerant consume-if-pending form).
- the run cleanup answers ok (0x00) and keeps draining while the TR answers
91XX (bounded); a cancel is only sent when a script asks for it - it tells
the card the user aborted the session and pushes assertive applets onto an
error path.
- new `proactive` action: STATUS rounds consume every announced command
(respond/first TERMINAL RESPONSE results, attempts/interval_ms bound) until
the card answers 9000; an optional require asserts at least one drained
command (an empty drain fails it), the final SW is the step's SW check and
a still-pending command is handed to the next step. PWA editor + summary +
validation, EN/RU help, docs, action-kind drift test.
- the PoR response form follows the command's TAR: _tar_is_rm (preset role
entries + the TS 101 220 Annex D ISD/RFM allocations) decides; a non-RM
TAR's reply is always raw (TS 102 226 4) - no fabricated status word even
when the bytes happen to parse (01 00 0B 91 ... used to read as SW 000B).
- a secured data too short for the compact structure (a 2-byte applet reply)
is recovered by _por_header_parse (the decode minus the compact parse; a
malformed packet or a failed RC/CC/DS check still yields no por) and
reported raw, so short applet replies are assertable via por.data.
Docs: test-scripts.md, api.md, help EN/RU, repo AGENTS. sw cache simple-v396.
Tests: 825 frontend + 755 Python green.
The scripted-SELECT note cited TS 102 226 7.2 alone although the paragraph
right above lists both B00000 and B00001: 7.2 is the UICC shared FS RFM
application (implicitly selected in MF), while an ADF RFM application starts
in its ADF (7.3). Also says the script has no *use* for an FCI rather than
nowhere to put it.
The alfa-dsa RFM script work showed a card refusing the P2='00' (FCI) form
of a SELECT inside a secured command script with 6A86, while P2='0C' (no
response data) executes - and a script has nowhere to put an FCI anyway.
Worksheet 1 gains the note (TS 102 226 7.2: the RFM application starts in
MF); the repo AGENTS records the observation. Docs only - no code, no
version or sw change.
The alfa-dsa control-commands run showed the error case: an applet-level
refusal (envelope 6200 for an unknown command) carries no PoR at all, so
a por expectation on such a step can never match. The authoring guide's
status-words section now states that a 62XX/63XX envelope does not
guarantee a response packet - other warning paths still deliver one (the
low-counter case arrives via SEND SHORT MESSAGE) - and that a step
expected to be refused should leave por at its "any" default or assert
"none"; help EN/RU notes the same. docs/test-scripts.md only, no code
change; sw cache simple-v392 (help files are precached).
The script author read por.sw as the envelope SW, so a por.sw expectation
on an applet's own TAR failed with (none).
- docs/test-scripts.md: a 'The three status words (envelope SW / PoR
status / R-APDU SW)' table in the authoring section - where each one
comes from, the script field and the report row - plus a cross-reference
from the por check paragraph; help EN/RU 8.9 points at it.
- a failed por.sw check on a response_type: 'raw' decode carries the check
detail 'the response is application data - an applet's own TAR has no
R-APDU SW; assert it with data' (the PWA renders check details).
- the runner's log prints APP DATA=<hex> (no R-APDU SW) for application
responses instead of the misleading R-APDU SW=(none) data=...; the
compact/scripting lines are unchanged.
- the step editor's custom-PoR block gets a one-line hint about the same.
Tests: 821 frontend + 730 Python; sw cache simple-v391.
pySim's CompactRemoteResp was applied to every response packet, so a
third-party applet's own TAR response parsed as count=128/SW=0110/data=''
(live 2026-10-04: the alfa-dsa applet's `80 01 10`) - a fabricated status
word and a lost response.
_decode_por now takes the plaintext command script's length (cmd_len): the
compact structure's command count cannot exceed it (TS 102 226 5.1.2
Table 5.1 - each command needs at least one byte), so a larger count is
classified `response_type: 'raw'`, the secured data becomes
`decoded.last_response_data` (a por.data check matches it) and no SW is
decoded; `secured_data` is exposed in every case.
Callers pass cmd_len where they know the plaintext: the test runner's scp80
step (None for a pre-built packet; carried in ctx['last_scp80'] for the
submit-PoR path), /api/send-ota (both paths), the RAM step sender and the
counter probe; a caller without it keeps the previous parse.
Docs: test-scripts.md and api.md describe the raw fallback.
Tests: 821 frontend + 729 Python; sw cache simple-v390.
An audit of docs/test-scripts.md against the engine (testscript.py,
events.py, the runner) found a handful of doc-level gaps, now fixed:
- the scp80 param defaults (tar = the preset's ISD role TAR, spi1 = that
TAR's MSL, spi2 = 01, kvn = the first keyset);
- the counter rule as implemented: the run advances/persists the counter
after every answered scp80 step when SPI1 requests a counter check
(refused packets move the local value forward too - it only moves up);
- respond is optional (an omitted object answers ok/0x00);
- the run-log section: the exact READ BINARY/READ RECORD/UPDATE BINARY,
SCP80 WRAPPED=/SP= and 'TEST-RUN step N failed:' lines;
- Known limitations: an expanded-format 61xx has no in-packet GET RESPONSE
(TS 102 226 5.2.1.1) - send the GET RESPONSE as a follow-up scp80 step;
- sms check da: a leading + and whitespace are ignored. The engine now
drops the + (the TPDU carries the international flag in the dialling
type, so '+79...' could otherwise never match the parsed digits);
docs/api.md and the local AGENTS note it.
Tests: 821 frontend + 726 Python.
Review of 7250dbd:
- the step editor's menu-select form gains a Match case select
(Case-insensitive (default) / Case-sensitive); the step summary flags a
case-sensitive step with (case), the saved params carry
case_sensitive: true only when chosen, and the docs say the editor
authors the flag.
- docs/api.md: fix the 'with an optionally' grammar.
- the Variant-2 menu test's comment claimed a contains match while it is an
exact one; a real contains leg is added ('ыбор' -> item 128).
- timeless rationale for the case-insensitive default; the format note now
dates the change.
sw cache simple-v389 (index.html/help changed).
Tests: 821 frontend + 726 Python.
No test scripts have been authored yet, so the format is still free to
change - the menu-select text match is now case-insensitive by default
(menu labels are UI text; case_sensitive: true still forces an exact-case
match, and a miss on it names the case-insensitive candidates).
Verification against the live card's own bytes (captured 2026-10-04):
- the Annex A Variant 2 Cyrillic menu (ids 128..130) resolves by text and
the case behaviour above is pinned ('кофе' -> item 130);
- the applet's SEND SHORT MESSAGE (alpha 'Отправка...', SMS-SUBMIT to
+79332505884) pins the new alpha and sms checks and the run-log line.
docs/help/api updated; sw cache simple-v388 (help pages changed).
Tests: 819 frontend + 726 Python.
The test scripts get the pieces an applet test needed:
- scp80 check.por accepts an object {status?, sw?, data?} asserting the
decoded PoR of this very exchange (inline or via SEND SHORT MESSAGE);
the evaluation is shared with the expect-step por check
(_por_check_results). The editor's PoR select gains 'custom' with the
three fields (an empty object refuses on save).
- a new alpha content check reads the command's Alpha identifier (05/85,
Annex A coded) - the text check stays bound to the 8D Text string, so a
command carrying both keeps them distinct.
- a new sms content check asserts a SEND SHORT MESSAGE's submit TPDU:
DA / PID / DCS / UDL / UD (the parsed fields are logged and reported;
an applet's own SMS, not the OTA PoR the por check decodes).
- scp80.params.format wraps the C-APDU in the TS 102 226 5.2.1 Command
Scripting template (expanded = AA..., expanded-ae = AE 80...00 00); the
log shows WRAPPED=, the report C-APDU=<effective> format=<fmt>.
- docs: Worksheet 1 addresses an RFM TAR (B00000/B00001/B00010 compact,
B00120/B00140/B00130 expanded) with the own-TAR and MSL/spi1 notes, and
file-write is documented as a direct APDU that does not fire
EVENT_REMOTE_FILE_UPDATE.
Tests: 819 frontend + 724 Python; sw cache simple-v387.
Verifying a script from the log was impossible: the runner wrote no card
lines, SCP80's plaintext C-APDU / secured packet / PoR landed only in the
report, and a menu selection logged nothing (the interactive path showed just
"STATUS poll (menu-select 9000)" / "STATUS -> 9000").
Every step now writes a `TEST-RUN step N:` line family to stderr, request
before response:
- generic actions: the APDU/raw event data sent and the SW/RESP received
(`APDU TX=...`, `ENVELOPE(Event Download) ... data=...`, `READ/UPDATE ... -> SW=...`);
- SCP80: `C-APDU=` (or `SP=`), `SECURED=<hex> (N B) TAR=... SPI1=... SPI2=... CNTR=...`,
the response SW, and the PoR - `PoR[inline] status=... TAR=... CNTR=... raw=...`
plus `R-APDU SW=... data=...` (with the bad-format note);
- expectations: `FETCH=<apdu> -> SW=... <raw>`, `CMD 0x.. <NAME> qual=..`,
`TR=<apdu> -> SW=...`, and `PoR[sms-submit] ...` + `R-APDU` for the SEND
SHORT MESSAGE transport;
- status: `STATUS 1/N -> <sw>` per attempt;
- menu selection: `MENU-SELECT ENVELOPE=<apdu> item=<id> ('<text>') -> SW=...`
(both the runner action and /api/menu-select; the old STATUS lines stay as
context).
The shared secured-packet sender logs each segment's answer
(`OTA SEND: ENVELOPE i/N -> <SW>`), the scp80 step's report `sent` now carries
the C-APDU/SP hex, and `--apdu-trace` remains the raw transport view.
help EN/RU and docs/test-scripts.md gained the "reading the run log" note.
Tests: 816 frontend + 718 Python; sw cache simple-v385.
The events without a semantic builder (MT call, IMS registration, slices, ...)
are network-sourced, but the raw `envelope` action had no `src` override - the
only way to express them was the semantic set. `envelope` now accepts
`src` (82 terminal / 83 network) exactly like the `event` action; the step
editor exposes it and the authoring guide gets the row.
Also: the guide marks `por` as SCP80-only (the normaliser refuses it
elsewhere) and the semantic-events section names the shared src override.
Tests: 813 frontend + 717 Python; sw cache simple-v382.
The other-applet batch: a test script can send the common event downloads
semantically instead of raw hex.
- events.py: server-side mirrors of the PWA's event forms for Location status
(0x03), Access technology change (0x0B), Network rejection (0x12 - the
LA/RA/TA object selected by the registration group, the extended EMM cause
and the extended information object) and Data connection status change
(0x1D - status/type/TI plus the optional cause, host-clock 8.39 date-time,
location information, access technology, APN and PDP/PDN/PDU type). Fields
are validated before the run (a bad value is a script error, not a step
failure); `src` overrides the device-identities source (default terminal,
matching the Phone forms).
- The engine gains the `event` action kind; the runner builds and sends it.
The PWA's action-kind list stays in sync (drift-guarded - the guard itself
caught its own regex bug on the first run).
- Byte parity: the vectors are generated from the PWA's own builders and
pinned in tests/test_events.py; the frontend suites assert the same values.
PLMN and SCTS helpers are mirrored too.
- The Phone tab's event form shows the built "Event data (hex)" (updated as
the fields change), so every event without a builder can be used through
the raw `envelope` action.
- The test-step editor offers the event select + a JSON fields textarea;
malformed JSON refuses the save with a clear message.
- docs/test-scripts.md (the semantic-event table, an event example, the
format stamp), docs/api.md and help EN/RU updated.
Tests: 812 frontend + 717 Python; sw cache simple-v381.
The applet-testing batch agreed after v3.15/3.16:
- menu-select by text: the step names the item by `text` (+ `mode`
exact/contains, `case_sensitive`) instead of the install-dependent id
(both or neither is refused); the runner resolves it against the card's
cached menu and raises a step error naming the available items when nothing
(or several items) matches. The cache is refreshed on every SET UP MENU
fetch - the proactive chain and the expect step - so an applet install (new
items/ids after its REFRESH) no longer leaves a stale menu behind. The
step editor offers the id or the text + mode and the client-side pre-check
bounds them.
- TERMINAL RESPONSE object order: both builders emitted the Item identifier
before the Result (and the scripted builder its Text string before it too);
TS 102 223 6.8.0 mandates Command details, Device identities, Result,
Duration, Text string, Item identifier. `testscript.build_tr` and
`_menu_send_response` now follow it; `respond.raw` is documented as
appended after the standard objects, and the exact-byte tests pin the order.
- Text codings: the scripted response codes the GSM default alphabet via the
GSM 03.38 codec ('00' packed, '04' 8-bit) instead of latin-1, keeps '08'
UCS2 and sends the spec's null text string for an empty answer; the packing
helper is shared with the interactive path (`testscript.pack_gsm7`). A
UCS2 GET INPUT answer is documented and tested.
- docs/test-scripts.md gained the handoff brief for the applet agent: the
value-collection table, fill-in worksheets for the two applet scenarios, a
menu-by-text example, the validation checklist and a format stamp; help
EN/RU and docs/api.md updated.
Tests: 809 frontend + 705 Python; sw cache simple-v380.
The scripts lived in the browser's localStorage although only the local
server can run them. The new test_scripts.py store
(~/.pysim-simple-server/test_scripts.json, --test-scripts PATH) sits next to
the card presets: stable uuids and timestamps, atomic writes, and every
mutation is validated with the runner's own engine (the submitted shape is
kept - the normaliser's output is not re-normalisable: it fills defaults
like an 'any' PoR check that the check normaliser then rejects), so a stored
script cannot fail at run start for a validation reason. Import accepts the
old localStorage export as-is (export/import remains the migration path; the
PWA import also takes an exported array).
- /api/test/scripts (GET card-free: path/count + scripts), POST create,
/update, /delete and /import serve the store; the endpoints answer 503
without a store and 500 on a write failure, like the preset endpoints.
- /api/test/run takes a stored script_id (resolved when no inline script is
sent); the PWA sends the edited copy inline plus the id for the report,
and the run snapshot carries script_id.
- The PWA's Test script pill loads from the store, writes through on edits
(debounced name, immediate step/new/copy/delete), reports load/save/delete
failures inline, and exports the portable {name, steps} shape.
Tests: 808 frontend + 701 Python; sw cache simple-v379.
Three gaps blocked SCP80 applet testing from the PWA:
- testRunPreset() still marshalled the pre-v3.8 flat preset fields
(kic/kid/keys/counter/tar/spi1/spi2, all empty on a stored preset), so
every SCP80 run failed with "SCP80 preset is incomplete: no keyset is
defined". The PWA sends the matched preset's id now and the server
resolves it from the store (_test_run_preset_from_body; the inline
`preset` body stays for API callers), so a run always uses the stored
keysets, TARs and counters. Regression tests on both sides.
- testscript._normalise_params dropped the scp80 step's `kvn` (the editor
exposed it and the runner and validation consumed it, so scripts
silently used the preset's first keyset). kvn is validated (1-15) and
passed through; the client-side problem check bounds it too.
- The PoR delivered as a SEND SHORT MESSAGE (PoR-in-submit, SPI2 bit 0x20)
is decoded for the expect step that fetches it: the new `por` content
check asserts the response status / R-APDU SW / response data, decoded
with the preceding scp80 step's context (concatenated SMS accumulate
across expectations). The inline transport stays on the action
(check.por / check.data).
- The new `files` content check asserts the File List of a REFRESH
(TS 102 223 8.18, tag 12/92) - e.g. qualifier 00 = NAA initialization
with full file change notification - as an order-insensitive set of FID
paths.
The step editor exposes both checks; help EN/RU, docs/api.md and the new
authoring reference docs/test-scripts.md document the format. Tests: 803
frontend + 680 Python; sw cache simple-v378.
catarrh